Ioin/109/2014 Of M/S Glaxo Smithkline Consumer Healthcare Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax Chd
High Court
08 Mar 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Ioin/109/2014 Of M/S Glaxo Smithkline Consumer Healthcare Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax Chd
Date of order
08 Mar 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Ioin/109/2014 Of M/S Glaxo Smithkline Consumer Healthcare Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax Chd, the High Court (2017) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
224LOIN-ITA-109-2014;IOIN-ITA-108-2014:IOIN-ITA-177-2014:I[OIN-ITA-259-201L5 aI[OIN-ITA-108 of 201
M/s Glaxo Smithkline Consumer Healthcare Ltd.
4%3
CIT, Chandigarh
Present:Mr. Ajay Vonra, Sr. Advocate witnMr. Rohit Jain, Advocate
for the appellant(s) (in ITA Nos.109, 177/2014 & 1108/201!for the respondent(s) (in ITA Nos. 108/2014 & 259/2015).for the respondent(s) (in ITA Nos. 108/2014 & 259/2015).
Ms. Urvashi Dnugga, Advocatefor the appellant(s) (in ITA No. 1108/2014 & 259/201!for the respondent(s) (in ITA Nos.109, 177/2014 & 108/2016)7777
On 21.02.2017, office was directed to list ITR Nos. 62 to
65 of 1982 and ITA No. 409 of 2007/7, for nearing along with theappeals. It has been pointed out by the office that inadvertently 'ITRNos. 62 to 65 of 1987' has been mentioned instead of 'ITR Nos. 627 t65 of 1995' and the same needs correction.
Ordered accordingly.
Photocopy of this order be placed on the files of otnerconnected cases.
(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL)JUDGE
March 08, 2017J.Ram
(RAMENDRA JAIN)JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue