Case LawHigh Court › Ioin/65/2016 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Ioin/65/2016 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -1 Chandigarh v. M/S Punjab Infrastructure Dev Board Chandigarh

High Court 15 Dec 2017 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Ioin/65/2016 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -1 Chandigarh v. M/S Punjab Infrastructure Dev Board Chandigarh
Date of order
15 Dec 2017
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Ioin/65/2016 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -1 Chandigarh v. M/S Punjab Infrastructure Dev Board Chandigarh, the High Court (2017) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARHSp! DB 2I[OIN-ITA-65-2016 IITA-65-2016 CIT(TDS)-1, Chandigarh $%& M/s Punjab Infrastructure Dev Board, Chandigarh Present:Mr. Ajay Aggarwal, Advocate forMr. Denesh Goyal, Sr. Standing Counselfor the appellant-revenue. None for the respondent. 2222 On 09.05.2017, ITA Nos. 65 of 2016, 69 of 2016, 97 of2016 and 98 of 2016, were disposed of vide common order. In thesaid order, the Income Tax Appeal numbers before the TribDunal werrecorded as ITA No. 788 to 791/Chd/2013. The same had beenrecorded on the basis of the head note of the appeals filed by therevenue. However, a communication dated 11[tn]September, 2017, hadbeen received from the Assistant Registrar, Income Tax AppellateTribunal, addressed to the Superintendent (Judl.), for AssistantRegistrar (C), Punjab & Haryana High Court, Chandigarh, intimatingtnat the correct appeal numbers were ITA Nos. 788 to /91/Chnd/201and not ITA Nos. 788 to 791/Chnd/2013 Accordingly, it is directed that in the order dated 09[tn]May,|2017, wnerever, reference to the ITA number of the TridDunal has beemade, the same be read as ITA Nos. 788 to /91/Chd/2014 instead ofITA nos. 788 to /91/Chd/2013. Office to carry out necessary corrections accordingly. Copy of this order be placed on the file of other connected Ca S@S (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL)JUDGE December 15, 2017 J.Ram (HARINDER SINGH SIDHU)JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan