Ipca Laboratories Limited, Mumbai v. The Dy. Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Central Circle β 13, Mumbai
High Court
11 Jan 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court Β· newos
Parties
Ipca Laboratories Limited, Mumbai v. The Dy. Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Central Circle β 13, Mumbai
Date of order
11 Jan 2011
Assessment year(s)
β
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Ipca Laboratories Limited, Mumbai v. The Dy. Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Central Circle β 13, Mumbai, the High Court (2011) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below β read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order β as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1108 OF 2009
IPCA Laboratories Limited, Mumbai..Appellant.
Versus
The Dy. Commissioner of Income-tax,Central Circle β 13, Mumbai..Respondent.
Mr.P.S. Sahadevan i/by Mr.D.A. Athawale for the appellant.Mr.Atul K. Jasani for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar & Mrs.Mridula Bhatkar, JJ.
P.C. :
DATE : 11[th] January, 2011.
1.This appeal was admitted on 14[th] August 2010 on the following
substantial questions of law.
a)Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal erred in taking the view that the appellant was entitled under Section 80HHC of the Act on the total income after excluding the deduction available under Section 80IB of the Act ?
b)Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal ought to have held that the appellant was entitled to deduction under Section 80HHC of the Act on the gross total income without reducing it by the deduction allowed under Section 80IB of the Act ?
c)Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal ought to have held that the provisions of Section 80IB(13) read with Section 80IA(9) had no application to Section 80HHC of the Act and that the appellant is entitled to full deduction under Sections 80HHC and
80IB of the Act, subject to its gross total income ?
2.Learned counsel on both the sides state that the aforesaid questions of law have already been answered by this Court in the case of
Associated Capsules Private Limited V/s. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax (Income Tax Appeal No.3036 of 2010) decided on 10th January 2011 in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.
3.The Appeal is disposed off accordingly with a direction to the Tribunal to re-compute the deduction in the light of aforesaid decision of this Court. No order as to costs.
(Mrs.Mridula Bhatkar, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only β not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CAβclient relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.