Ipca Laboratories Ltd v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
16 Dec 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Ipca Laboratories Ltd v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
16 Dec 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Ipca Laboratories Ltd v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4218 OF 2008IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L)NO.3961 OF 2008
Ipca Laboratories Ltd.Vs.The Assistant Commissioner ofIncome Tax
..Appellant
..Respondents
Mr.P.C.Tripathi with Mr.A.K.Jasani for the Appellant.Mr.B.M.Chatterjee with Mr.P.S.Sahadeavn for theRespondents.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &V.C.DAGA, JJ.DATE : 16TH DECEMBER, 2008
P.C.
.Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. Bythis Notice of Motion, the Appellant is seekingcondonation of delay caused in filing the aboveAppeal. Perused the Notice of Motion and Affidavit insupport thereof. For the reasons stated thereinsufficient cause is made out. There is no case ofinaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the partof the Appellant. Hence, the Notice of Motion is made
absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue