In Irish Laboratories (India v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2001) decided the matter.
Issue: Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- IRISH LABORATORIES (INDIA) Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 151 of 1988
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH
and
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA
============================================================
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO
to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO
of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO
of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution
of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO --------------------------------------------------------------
IRISH LABORATORIES (INDIA)
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:
1. INCOME TAX REFERENCE No. 151 of 1988
MR RK PATEL for Petitioner No. 1
MR BB NAIK with MR MANISH R BHATT for Respondent No. 1
--------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM : MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH
and
MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA
Date of decision: 25/09/2001
ORAL JUDGEMENT
(Per : MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH)
�This is a reference made at the instance of the
assessee in respect of assessment year 1981-82.
�Mr RK Patel, learned counsel for the
applicant-assessee states, under instructions from the
applicant-assessee, that the applicant does not press
this reference.
�We accordingly decline to answer the questions
referred for our opinion on the ground that the reference
is not pressed by the assessee.
�The reference accordingly stands disposed of with
no order as to costs.
�����(M.S. Shah, J.)
�����(D.A. Mehta, J.)
sundar/-
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.