Irxa/11/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -9, Mumbai v. M/S Citicorp Securities And Invst. Ltd., Mumbai
High Court
09 Jun 2009 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Irxa/11/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -9, Mumbai v. M/S Citicorp Securities And Invst. Ltd., Mumbai
Date of order
09 Jun 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Irxa/11/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -9, Mumbai v. M/S Citicorp Securities And Invst. Ltd., Mumbai, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
CONTINUATION SHEET No.IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORIGINAL SIDE
INTEREST TAX APPEAL (LDG.) NO. 5 OF 2008
WITHNOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3058 OF 2008ANDINTEREST TAX APPEAL (LDG.) NO. 6 OF 2008WITHNOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3060 OF 2008
----------------------------------------------------------------
Office Notes, Office:Memoranda of Coram, : Court's or Judge's ordersappearances,Court 's :orders or directions & :Prothonotary's orders .:
----------------------------------------------------------------
P.S.Sahadevan for the applicant.
Mr.Damodar i/b. Kanga & Co for the respdt.
CORAM :V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. DATED :9[th] June 2009.
P.C.:
All the appeals are already rejected under rule 986 of the High Court (Original) Side Rules since the appellant has failed to remove office objections on or before 29[th] April, 2009. Hence, these appeals be removed from the board.
In view of the above, notices of motion also do not survive. The same are also rejected for want of cause of action with no order as to costs.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue