Irxa/16/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-3 v. M/S Shanti Traidng Pvt Ltd
High Court
19 Jun 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Irxa/16/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-3 v. M/S Shanti Traidng Pvt Ltd
Date of order
19 Jun 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Irxa/16/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-3 v. M/S Shanti Traidng Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INTEREST TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1 OF 2005
The Commissioner of Income Tax -3, Mumbai
..... Appellant
V/s.
M/s.Shrusti Trading Pvt. Ltd.
..... Respondent
Mr.R.Ashokan a/w Poonam Bhosale i/b Pankaj Kapoor, Advocates, for theAppellant.Mr.Raj Darak, Advocate for the Respondent.
CORAM : R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR &P.B.MAJMUDAR, JJ.
DATED : JUNE 19, 2008.
P.C.
1.In view of the withdrawal of the notice of motion No.1438 of 2005, theInterest Tax Appeal (L) No.1 of 2005 also stands disposed of. TheRegistry is directed to forward copy of this order to the Commissioner ofIncome Tax-3. Needless to say that appellant would be entitled to refundof the court fees in accordance with the provisions of law.
( P.B.MAJMUDAR, J.)
( R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue