Case LawHigh Court › It v. Madgavkar

It v. Madgavkar

High Court 26 Mar 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcbgoa
Parties
It v. Madgavkar
Date of order
26 Mar 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In It v. Madgavkar, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 23 OF 2007 M/S. EMERALD CRUISES REPRESENTED IT PARTNER MR. ANAND V. MADGAVKAR VersusTHE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AND 2 ORS. ... Applicant ... Respondents Mr. M. S. Sonak, Advocate for the Applicant. P.C.:- -Coram:S.A.BOBDE & N. A. BRITTO, JJ. -Date: 26th March, 2007 Mr. M. S. Sonak, the learned Counsel for the applicant states thatthe amount for dispute has already been deposited by the applicant withthe Revenue. Accordingly, the amount shall be subject to the result of the Appeal. S.A.BOBDE, J. RD. N. A. BRITTO, J.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan