Ita 187/2017. Cm. Appt,.Sqsq/7Ni7Principalcommissionerof Incometax, Delhi-2 v. Versuscopalresearchindiapvt. Ltd
High Court
22 Mar 2017 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Ita 187/2017. Cm. Appt,.Sqsq/7Ni7Principalcommissionerof Incometax, Delhi-2 v. Versuscopalresearchindiapvt. Ltd
Date of order
22 Mar 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ita 187/2017. Cm. Appt,.Sqsq/7Ni7Principalcommissionerof Incometax, Delhi-2 v. Versuscopalresearchindiapvt. Ltd, the High Court (2017) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$-3 &4
In the fflGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
ITA 187/2017. CM. APPT,.SQSQ/7ni7PRINCIPALCOMMISSIONEROF INCOMETAX, DELHI-2
+
AppellantRespondent
versus
versusCOPALRESEARCHINDIAPVT. LTD.
+ •ITA 188/2017. CM. APPT..SQQn/?ni7
PRINCIPALCOMMISSIONEROF INCOMETAX, DELHI-2
Appellant
versus
versusCOPALRESEARCHINDIAPVT. LTD.RespondentThrough : Sh. Rahul Kaushik, Sr. StandingCounsel.
None for the respondent.
CORAM:HON'BLEMR. JUSTICES.RAVINDRABHATHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMIWAZIRI
ORDER22.03.2017
%
^
The Revenue'sgrievancein thesetwo appealsis withrespecttothe order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) whichdoubted the use of six comparables and remitted the matter forreconsiderationof the TransferPricingOfficer(TPO). It is urged bylearnedcounselthatboth the DisputeResolutionPanel(DRP) and theTPO had made reasons and sent notices as to why six comparableshad to beincludedforofALP determination. purposes
The Court has considered the submissions and- also thereasoningofthe ITAT. Therecannotbe any doubtthatthe Revenueis
Page I of2
not prejudiced as it is at liberty to argue all submissions which are notbeing foreclosed by the ITAT. In these circumstances, no substantialquestionof law arises.The appealsare accordinglydismissed.
MARCH 22,2017/ajk
iif".S. RAVENDRA BHAT, J//NAJMl WAZmi, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.