Ita 217/2013 And Cm Appt..n0. 7934/2021Actis Advisers Pvtltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Respondentthrough: Mr. Deepak Anand, Advocate
High Court
26 Feb 2021 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Ita 217/2013 And Cm Appt..n0. 7934/2021Actis Advisers Pvtltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Respondentthrough: Mr. Deepak Anand, Advocate
Date of order
26 Feb 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Ita 217/2013 And Cm Appt..n0. 7934/2021Actis Advisers Pvtltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Respondentthrough: Mr. Deepak Anand, Advocate, the High Court (2021) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
$-15
+
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
ITA 217/2013 and CM APPT..N0. 7934/2021ACTIS ADVISERS PVTLTD
..... Appellant
Through: Mr. Bhuwan Dhoopar, Advocate.
versus
^
%
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX RespondentThrough: Mr. Deepak Anand, Advocate.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHERHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TALWANT SINGHORDER
26.02.2021
[Court hearing convened via video-conferencing on account of COVID-19]
CM APPL.No. 7934/2021
1. This is an application filed on behalf of the appellant/assessee seekingleave to withdraw the instant appeal in view of the fact that steps have beeninitiated by it to take benefit of the provisions of Direct Tax Vivad SeVishwas Act, 2020 [in short "the Act"].
2. According to Mr. Bhuwan Dhoopar, who appears on behalf of theappellant/assessee, the appellant/assessee has resolved the tax dispute notonly-in the instant appeal i.e., ITA 216/2013, but also in the Revenue'sappeal, which, according to him, is on the regular board and is numbered asITA 425/2013.
ITA 217/2013
page 1 of 2
Signature Not Verified
3. Having regard to the submissions made by the counsel for the •appellant/assessee, the prayer made in the application is allowed. However,liberty is given to both, the appellant/assessee, as well as therespondent/Revenue, to approach the Court, in case, the designated authoritydoes not issue a certificate in the prescribed form i.e. Form-5.ITA 217/2013
4. In view of the order passed in CM APPL. 7934/2021, the appeal shallstand closed. The order passed today will be placed by the Registry in thecase file concerning ITA No. 425/2013.
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J
FEBRUARY 26,2021
tr
cxTALWANT SINH
Click here to check corrwendum. if any
ITA 217/2013
page 2 of 2
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.