Case Law › High Court › Ita 56/2001Commissioner Of Income Tax v....

Ita 56/2001Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Ansal Properties & Indus. Ltd

High Court 31 Oct 2012 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · dhcdb

Parties

Date of order

31 Oct 2012

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Ita 56/2001Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Ansal Properties & Indus. Ltd, the High Court (2012) decided the matter.

Decision: The present Appeals are disposed of in view of the separate judgment passed today in ITA 18/1999 titled Commissioner of Income Tax vs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :11.10.2012 PRONOUNCED ON:31.10.2012 ITA 56/2001COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant versus M/S ANSAL PROPERTIES & INDUS. LTD ..... Respondent ITA 57/2001COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant versus M/S ANSAL PROPERTIES & INDUS.LTD ..... Respondent ITA 105/2001COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant versus M/S ANSAL HOUSING & CONSTRUCTION LTD. ..... Respondent ITA 107/2001COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant versus M/S ANSAL PROPERTIES & INDUSTRIES LTD. ..... Respondent ITA 109/2001COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant versus M/S ANSAL PROPERTIES & INDUSTRIES LTD. ..... Respondent ITA 114/2001COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant versus M/S ANSAL HOUSING & CONSTRUCTION LTD. ..... Respondent ITA 177/2001COMMISSIONER OF INCOMET TAX ..... Appellant versus M/S ANSAL PROPERTIES & INDUSTRIES LTD. ..... Respondent ITA 212/2005 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant versus M/S. ANSAL HOUSING AND CONSTRUCTION LTD. ..... Respondent ….Appellant Through : Sh. Abhishek Maratha, Sr. Standing Counsel with Ms. Anshul Sharma, Advocate. ….Respondents Through : Sh. Ajay Vohra, Ms. Kavita Jha and Sh. Somnath Shukla, Advocates. Sh. Satyen Sethi and Sh. Arta Trana Panda, Advocates. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT 1. The present Appeals are disposed of in view of the separate judgment passed today in ITA 18/1999 titled Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/s Ansal Housing Finance and Leasing Co. Ltd. (S.RAVINDRA BHAT) JUDGE 31[st ]October, 2012 (R.V. EASWAR) JUDGE

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.