+ Ita 913/2018 The Commissioner Of Income Tax-International Taxation-2 v. Intelsat Corporation
High Court
14 Jan 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
+ Ita 913/2018 The Commissioner Of Income Tax-International Taxation-2 v. Intelsat Corporation
Date of order
14 Jan 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In + Ita 913/2018 The Commissioner Of Income Tax-International Taxation-2 v. Intelsat Corporation, the High Court (2019) decided the matter under Section 234B of the Income-tax Act.
Decision: Recording the above, the appeal is disposed of
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
$~7
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 913/2018 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-INTERNATIONAL TAXATION-2 ..... Appellant THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-INTERNATIONAL TAXATION-2 ..... Appellant
Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, SSC.
versus
INTELSAT CORPORATION ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Sachit Jolly and Mr. Siddharth Joshi, Advocates.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI
%
O R D E R14.01.2019
Respondent has entered appearance and states that the present appeal may be disposed of in terms of the order dated 28[th] May, 2018 passed in ITA No. 644/2018, The Commissioner of Income Tax- (International Taxation) -1 versus GE Transportation Parts LLC.
In view of the aforesaid position, we are inclined to pass the following order:-
(i). The question raised by the Revenue in these appeals relates to levy of interest under Section 234B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 which issue is covered against them vide the judgment of this Court in ‘Director of Income Tax (International Taxation) vs. GE Packaged Power Inc.’, (2015) 373 ITR 65 (Delhi).
(ii). The appeal against the said decision is pending before the Supreme
Court as special leave to appeal has been granted.
(iii). Counsel for the parties state that the ruling by the Supreme Court would equally apply to the present appeal. Recording the above, the appeal is disposed of.
(iv). In case, of any difficulty it will be open to the parties to file an application in this appeal after the decision of the Supreme Court.
SANJIV KHANNA, J.
JANUARY 14, 2019 MR
ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.