Case Law › High Court › Ita 985/2018 v. Surya Buildwell Pvt. Ltd

Ita 985/2018 v. Surya Buildwell Pvt. Ltd

High Court 10 Sep 2018 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · dhcdb

Parties

Date of order

10 Sep 2018

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Ita 985/2018 v. Surya Buildwell Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal.

Decision: Taking the statement made by learned counsel for the appellanton record, the appeals are disposed of, without examining thequestion raised.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Signature Not Verified Signed By:RAM DATTSigning Date:09.10.2024 15:41Certify that the digital and physical file havebeen compared and the digital data is as perthe physical file and no page is missing. '"'' *in'the comx of delhi at new delhihigh + S 985/2018ffiPR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -CENTRAW^^^^^^^ ITA 985/2018 Through; Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Advocate versus SURYA BUILDWELL PVT. LTD. PVT. LTD. LTD. nThrough: Mr. Rohit Jam & Mr. Aniket D.Agrawal, Advocates WITH +ITA 988/2018 THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Through; Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Advocate versus ST TRYA BUILDWELL PVT. LTD. Respondent Through; Mr. Rohit Jain & Mr. Aniket D.Agrawal, AdvocatesAgrawal, Advocates WITH ^COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Through; Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Advocate versus SURYA BUILDWELL PVT. LTD. n Through; Mr. Rohit Jam & Mr. Aniket D. Agrawal, Advocates- WITH +ITA 990/2018PrC»SSIONER OF INCOME TAX -CENTRAL Through; Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Advocate versus SURYABUILDWELLPVT.LTD. . & DMr. Rohit Jam & Mr. AniKet u.Through: Agrawal, Advocates^ WITH + COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -CENTRA^3^^^^^^^Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Advocate versus SURYABUILDWELLPVT.LTD. D Through; Mr. Rohit Jam & Mr. Aniket D.Agrawal, Advocates^ + WITH TM COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -CENTR^^^^^^^^^^ Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Advocate versus SURYABUE.DWELLPVT.LTD. Respondent Throughi Mr. Rohit Jain & Mir. Anikct D.Agrawal, Advocates CORAM;HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHARORDER %10.09.2018 Learned counsel for the assessee, who appears on advancenotice, states that he has no objection if the delay in filing and refiling of the appeals is condoned. Accordingly, the applications areallowed and the delay is condoned. Learned counsel for the Revenue states that these appeals arisefrom a consolidated order, but the tax effect in each appeal is belowRs.50,00,000/- and these appeals may be disposed of, in view ofCircular No.3/2018, dated 11.7.2018, without adjudicating thequestion/issue raised. It may be clarified that the issue/question is leftopen and not decided. Taking the statement made by learned counsel for the appellanton record, the appeals are disposed of, without examining thequestion raised. Issue/question is left open. . SANJIVKHANNA, J SEPTEMBER 10, 2018/tp CHAWHR SHEKHAR, J

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.