Case Law › High Court › Ita v. M/S Him Technoforge Ltd

Ita v. M/S Him Technoforge Ltd

High Court 16 Dec 2019 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · cmis

Parties

Date of order

16 Dec 2019

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Ita v. M/S Him Technoforge Ltd, the High Court (2019) allowed the appeal.

Issue: Whether approved for reporting?[1] For the appellant. : Mr.

Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA ITA No. 14 of 2019Decided on: 16.12.2019 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Shimla …Appellant Versus M/s Him Technoforge Ltd., ....Respondent.…………………………………………………………………………… Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice L.Narayana Swamy, Chief Justice.The Hon’ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?[1] For the appellant. : Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Diwan Singh Negi, Advocate. For respondent : Mr. Vishal Mohan, Advocate, for therespondent. L.Narayana Swamy, Chief Justice. (Oral) Mr. Diwan Singh Negi, learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the present appeal. Permissiongranted. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. 2.Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also standdisposed of. ( L. Narayana Swamy), Chief Justice (Jyotsna Rewal ua),Judge 16[th] December, 2019(Rohit) 1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.