Ita v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
09 May 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · cmis
Parties
Ita v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
09 May 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Ita v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: Whether approved for reporting ?[1] For the petitioner(s):Mr.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLAITAs No. 19 and 20 of 2018.Date of decision: 9[th] May, 2018.
1. ITA No. 19 of 2018.M/s SBS Biotech Unit- I
..…..Appellant.
Versus
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax
……Respondent.
2. ITA No. 20 of 2018.M/s SBS Biotech Unit -II
..…..Appellant.
VersusPrincipal Commissioner of Income Tax
……Respondent.
Coram:The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief Justice.The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting ?[1]
For the petitioner(s):Mr. Vishal Mohan, Advocate and Mr.Sushant Kaprate & Mr. PraveenSharma, Advocates.For the respondent(s):Mr. Diwan Singh Negi, vice Ms.Vandana Kuthiala, Advocate.
______________________________________________
Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief Justice (Oral)
Undisputedly, issues involved in the presentappeals already stand adjudicated by this Court in ITA No. 20 of2015, titled as M/s Stovekraft India v. Commissioner ofIncome Tax, decided on 28.11.2017.
2.As such, making the directions in M/s StovekraftIndia (supra) applicable mutatis mutandis, also to the presentappeals, the same are disposed of.
3.Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of
accordingly.
(Sanjay Karol ) Acting Chief Justice.
May 09, 2018. (cm Thakur)
(Sandeep Sharma) Judge.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue