Ita v. Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Shimla …
High Court
10 Jul 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cmis
Parties
Ita v. Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Shimla …
Date of order
10 Jul 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Ita v. Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Shimla …, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.
Decision: 2.As such, making the directions inM/sStovekrat India (supra) applicable mutatis mutandis, also to the present appeals, the same are disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
ITA No. 49 of 2018
a/w ITA No. 50 of 2018Decided on: 10.07.2018
ITA No. 49/2018.M/s Shrishti Technologies
…..Appellant.
Versus
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax Shimla …...Respondents.
ITA No. 50/2018.M/s Aerowin International
…..Appellant.
Versus
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax Shimla …...Respondents.
Coram
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief justice.The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?
For the petitioner(s): Mr. Rakesh Kumar Thakur, Advocate.
For the respondent(s):Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, Sr. Advocate withMs. Vandana Kuthiala, Advocate.
Sanjay Karol Acting Chief Justice.(Oral)
Undisputedly, issues involved in the presentappeals already stand adjudicated by this Court in ITA No.
20 of 2015, titled asM/s Stovekraft India v.Commissioner of Income Tax,decided on 28.11.2017.
2.As such, making the directions inM/sStovekrat India (supra) applicable mutatis mutandis, also
to the present appeals, the same are disposed of.
3.Pending applications, if any, also stand disposedof accordingly.
(Sanjay Karol),
Acting Chief Justice
July 10, 2018
(cm Thakur )
(Ajay Mohan Goel,) Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue