I.t.a v. Shri Vivek Mundra
High Court
19 Jan 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
I.t.a v. Shri Vivek Mundra
Date of order
19 Jan 2022
Assessment year(s)
2006-07
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In I.t.a v. Shri Vivek Mundra, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Decision: Accordingly, appeal stands disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
ORDER SHEETIN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTASpecial Jurisdiction (Income Tax)ORIGINAL SIDE
I.T.A. No.107 of 2012Commissioner of Income Tax, Kolkata-III, Kolkata.VersusShri Vivek Mundra.
BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE T.S. SIVAGNANAM-And- The Hon’ble JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA Date : 19[th] January, 2022.
Mr. P.K. Bhowmick, Adv.… for the Appellant.Mr. Siddhartha Das, Adv.… for the Respondent.
This appeal, filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act by therevenue, is directed against the order dated 24[th] February, 2012 passed bythe Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘B’ Bench, Kolkata, in ITANo.1409/Kol/2009 for the assessment year 2006-07.We have heard the learned Counsel for the parties.
It is pointed out by the learned Counsel for the appellant that the taxwhich has been demanded is Rs.77,84,323/- as could be revealed from theorder passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) VIII dated 18[th]
June, 2009. If such is the position, then the revenue cannot prosecute theappeal on the ground of low tax effect.
Accordingly, appeal stands disposed of. Substantial questions of lawwhich have been framed for consideration, are left open.
(T.S. SIVAGNANAM, J.)
(HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA, J.)
Gh/kb,
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.