Ita v. Ita
High Court
03 Jun 2015 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · cmis
Parties
Ita v. Ita
Date of order
03 Jun 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ita v. Ita, the High Court (2015) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Issue: Whether approved for reporting ?[1] For the appellant(s): Mr.
Decision: Accordingly, the appeals are disposed of alongwith pending applications, if any.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
ITAs No. 18 and 19 of 2015.
Date of decision: 3[rd] June, 2015.
ITA No.18 of 2015.Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS)-2 Chandigarh …..Appellant. Versus Chief Manager PNB Shimla …Respondent
ITA No.19 of 2015.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS)-2 Chandigarh
…..Appellant. Versus Chief Manager PNB Shimla …Respondent
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Chief Justice.The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting ?[1]
For the appellant(s):
Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Vandana Kuthiala and Mr. Diwan Singh Negi, Advocates.
For the respondent(s):
Nemo.
_______________________________________________________
Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Chief Justice (Oral)
The learned counsel for the appellant(s) stated at the Bar that the issue involved in these appeals is covered by the decision rendered by the Division Bench of this Court dated 31.12.2014, passed in ITA No. 17 of 2014, titled Commissioner of
Income Tax (TDS), Chandigarh vs. State Bank of Patiala Sectt. Shimla. His statement is taken on record. He has also filed across the Board, the copy of judgment dated 31.12.2014, passed in the aforesaid ITA, made part of the file.
2. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to dispose of both these appeals, in terms of the judgment, referred to supra. Ordered accordingly. The judgment passed in ITA No. 17 of
2014, titled Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS), Chandigarh vs. State Bank of Patiala Sectt. Shimla, referred to above shall form part of this judgment also.
1Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?.
3. Accordingly, the appeals are disposed of alongwith
pending applications, if any. Copy dasti.
( Mansoor Ahmad Mir ) Chief Justice.
June 03, 2015. (cm Thakur)
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.