Ita v. M/S Hoshiarpur Improvement Trust, Hoshiarpur
High Court
23 Dec 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Ita v. M/S Hoshiarpur Improvement Trust, Hoshiarpur
Date of order
23 Dec 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita v. M/S Hoshiarpur Improvement Trust, Hoshiarpur, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Accordingly, for the reasons stated therein, these ITA No.76 of 2016 appeals filed by the revenue are dismissed, A photocopy of this order be placed on the files of other connected cases| (S.J.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
ITA No.76 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA.AT CHANDIGARH
(1)
ITA No.76 of 2016
The Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Chandigarh....AppellantVve;rsus
M/s Amritsar Improvement Trust, Amritsar
....Respondent
(2)ITA No.77 of 2016
The Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Chandigarh....AppellantVeTSUSM/s Hoshiarpur Improvement Trust, Hoshiarpur
....Respondent
(3)ITA No.78 of 2016The Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Chandigarh....Appellantversus
M/s Hoshiarpur Improvement Trust, Hoshiarpur
....Respondent
(4)ITA No.79 of 2016
The Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Chandigarh....Appellantversus
M/s Amritsar Improvement Trust, Amritsar
....Respondent
~).
(5)
ITA No.80 of 2016
The Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Chandigarh....Appellantversus
M/s Bathinda Improvement Trust, Bathinda
....Respondent
(6)ITA No.86 of 2016
The Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Chandigarh....AppellantversusM/s Amritsar Improvement Trust, Amritsar
....Respondent
(7)
ITA No.88 of 2016
The Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Chandigarh....AppellantVeTSUSM/s Amritsar Improvement Trust, Amritsar
....Respondent
(8)ITA No.89 of 2016
The Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Chandigarh....AppellantVersusM/s Pathankot Improvement Trust, Pathankot
....Respondent
(9)ITA No.133 of 2016
The Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Chandigarh....Appellant
ITA No.76 of 2016
VeTSUS
M/s Jalandhar Improvement Trust, Jalandhar
....Respondent
(10)ITA No.203 of 2016
The Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), ChandigarhVeTSUS
....Appellant
M/s Improvement Trust Sangrur
....Respondent
Date of decision: 23.12.2016
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.J. VAZIFDAR, CHIEF JUSTICEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL
eK SR
Present: Mr. Denesh Goyal, Senior Standing Counselfor the appellant(s) (in ITA Nos.76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 86,88, 89, 133 & 203 of 2016),
Mr. Rohit Sud, Advocatefor the respondent(s) in UTA No.77, 78, 89, 133 of 2016),
Mr. Rishab Kapoor, AdvocateMr. Salil Kapoor, Advocate andMr. Saurabh Kapoor, Advocatefor the respondent(s)(in ITA Nos.76, 79, 86, 88 of 2016).
None for the respondents (in ITA No.80 & 203 of 2016).
RRS
S.J. VAZIFDAR,CHIEF JUSTICE (QRAL)
It is admitted that the result in these appeals follows the resultin ITA No.147 of 2016 titled as Commissioner of Income Tax vs.Improvement Trust Moga, which was disposed of by a separate order andjudgment passed today. Accordingly, for the reasons stated therein, these
ITA No.76 of 2016
appeals filed by the revenue are dismissed,
A photocopy of this order be placed on the files of other
connected cases|
(S.J. VAZIFDAR)CHIEF JUSTICE
December 23, 2016Jyoti I
(DEEPAK SIBAL)JUDGE
(1)Whether speaking/reasoned(11)Whether reportable
Yes/NoYes/No
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.