Ita Nos.62 Of 2009Commissioner Of Income Tax, Shimla v. M/S H.p. State Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd
High Court
14 Nov 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cmis
Parties
Ita Nos.62 Of 2009Commissioner Of Income Tax, Shimla v. M/S H.p. State Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd
Date of order
14 Nov 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Ita Nos.62 Of 2009Commissioner Of Income Tax, Shimla v. M/S H.p. State Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
ITA Nos.62 of 2009 and
16 of 2010Decided on: 14.11.2024
1.ITA Nos.62 of 2009Commissioner of Income Tax, Shimla...Appellant
Versus
M/s H.P. State Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd....Respondent
2.ITA Nos.16 of 2010Commissioner of Income Tax, Shimla...Appellant
Versus
M/s H.P. State Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd....Respondent
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Acting Chief JusticeHon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge
Whether approved for reporting? No.For the appellant: Mr. Neeraj Sharma, Advocate.
For the respondent:Mr. Prashant Sharma, Advocate.
Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Acting Chief Justice (Oral)
In light of Notification dated 17[th] September, 2024,
issued by the Government of India, Ministry of Finance,Department of Revenue, Central Board of Direct Taxes, learnedcounsel for the appellant states that he is under instructions to
withdraw both the appeals. Accordingly, both the appeals aredisposed of as such.
2.Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand
disposed of.
( Tarlok Singh Chauhan ) Acting Chief Justice
November 14, 2024
(vt)
( Satyen Vaidya )Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue