Ita/100001/2020 Of The Saraswat Co-Operative Bank Limited v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court
12 Dec 2023 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karhcdharwad
Parties
Ita/100001/2020 Of The Saraswat Co-Operative Bank Limited v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
12 Dec 2023
Assessment year(s)
2010-11
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ita/100001/2020 Of The Saraswat Co-Operative Bank Limited v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
JAGADISHT RDigitally signed byJAGADISH T RDate: 2023.12.1413:00:17 +0530
- 1 -
NC: 2023:KHC-D:14580-DBITA No. 100001 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 12 DAY OF DECEMBER, 2023
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV
AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 100001 OF 2020
BETWEEN:
THE SARASWAT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED, BRANCH DIVATE COMPLEX, CLUB ROAD, HUBBALLI-580029, KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY, MR.DAMODAR DWARKANATH DESHPANDE.
- APPELLANT
(BY SRI. C.K. NANDAKUMAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS WARD-1, HUBLI, CR BUILDING, NAVANAGAR, HUBLI-580025, KARNATAKA.
- RESPONDENT
THIS ITA IS FILED U/SEC. 260A OF THE INCOME-TAX ACT, 1961, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER OF THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL BANGALORE ‘B’ BENCH, DATED 03.11.2017 IN I.T.A. NOS.1246-49/BANG/2017 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2010-11, 2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14 (ANNEXURE-A) & ETC.
THIS ITA, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, S.SUNIL DUTT YADAVJ., PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
There is no representation on behalf of the appellant. Order dated 05.12.2023 reads as hereunder:
“No representation when the matter is called out.
It is noticed in the order dated 24.07.2023 that finally two weeks’ time was granted to comply with the office objections. It is also noticed that the office objections at Sl.Nos.7(a) and 8 have not been complied with.
As the video conferencing facility is suspended due to technical reasons, as a last opportunity, re-list the matter in the same stage on 12.12.2023.”
In light of the same, it is clear that the appellant is not diligent in prosecuting the proceedings. The office objections are also not complied. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- JUDGE
BVV / List No.: 1 Sl No.: 17
Sd/- JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.