Case LawHigh Court › Ita/100002/2020 Of M/S. Kanakadas Pattin...

Ita/100002/2020 Of M/S. Kanakadas Pattin Sahakari Sangh Niyamit v. The Income-Tax Officer

High Court 14 Mar 2024 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karhcdharwad
Parties
Ita/100002/2020 Of M/S. Kanakadas Pattin Sahakari Sangh Niyamit v. The Income-Tax Officer
Date of order
14 Mar 2024
Assessment year(s)
2015-16
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/100002/2020 Of M/S. Kanakadas Pattin Sahakari Sangh Niyamit v. The Income-Tax Officer, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: The appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

VISHALNINGAPPAPATTIHALLocation: HIGH COURTOF KARNATAKADHARWAD BENCHDate: 2024.03.1415:05:27 +0530 NC: 2024:KHC-D:5228-DBITA No. 100002 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 14 DAY OF MARCH, 2024 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE UMESH M ADIGA INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 100002 OF 2020 BETWEEN: M/S. KANAKADAS PATTIN SAHAKARI SANGH NIYAMIT OPP: TAHASILDAR OFFICE, POST: BADAMI, DIST: BAGALKOT, R/BY ITS MANAGER, SHRI.PRASHANTH S/O NAGUSHA, SINGRI, AGED ABOUT: 33 YEARS. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. H R KAMBIYAVAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE INCOME-TAX OFFICER WARD 1, C.R. BUILDING, NAVANAGAR, BAGALKOT. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), KIMJI BAI BUILDING, OPP-CIVIL HOSPITAL, BELAGAVI-590001. (APPEALS), KIMJI BAI BUILDING, OPP-CIVIL HOSPITAL, BELAGAVI-590001. 3. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (ADMINISTRATION), KIMJI BAI BUILDING, OPP-CIVIL HOSPITAL, BELAGAVI-590001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. Y V RAVIRAJ, ADVOCATE) THIS ITA IS FILED U/SEC.260A OF THE INCOME-TAX ACT, 1961, PRAYING TO, A. FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW AS STATED ABOVE. B. ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER OF THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ORDER DATED 23.12.2019 OF THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU, ”SMC-A” BENCH, BENGALURU IN ITA NO. 1187/bang/2019 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2015-16 VIDE ANNEXURE-A & ETC., THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, M.I.ARUN, J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT The appeal is of the year 2020. Till today the office objections are not complied with. 2.The Advocate for the appellant is absent. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. The appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. The appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan