Ita/100003/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Praveen V Doddanavar
High Court
20 Feb 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karhcdharwad
Parties
Ita/100003/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Praveen V Doddanavar
Date of order
20 Feb 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/100003/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Praveen V Doddanavar, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKADHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 20 DAY OF FEBRUARY 2017
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARIAND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR
INCOME TAX APPEAL No.100003/2014
BETWEEN
1.THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,KARNATAKA (CENTRAL), CENTRAL REVENUEBUILDING, QUEEN’S ROAD,BANGALORE-560 001.KARNATAKA (CENTRAL), CENTRAL REVENUEBUILDING, QUEEN’S ROAD,BANGALORE-560 001.
2.THE JOINT COMMISSIONEROF INCOME TAX,(OSD), CENTRAL CIRCLE-2,BELGAUM.OF INCOME TAX,(OSD), CENTRAL CIRCLE-2,BELGAUM.
... APPELLANTS
(By Sri. Y V RAVIRAJ, ADV.)
AND
1.PRAVEEN V DODDANAVARDODDANAVAR COPORATE HOUSE,738/1, KHANAPUR ROAD,(NEAR 3RD RAILWAY GATE,)BELGAUM.... RESPONDENT
(By Smt. JINITA CHATTERJEE, ADV.)
THIS ITA FILED UNDER SECTION 260A OF THE INCOME-TAX ACT, 1961 AGAINST ORDER PASSED INITA.NO.24/PNJ/2013 DTD:06.09.2013 ON THE FILE OF THEINCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PANAJI BENCH, PANAJI,
Date of Judgment 20.02.2017 in ITA.No.100003.2014The Commissioner of Income Tax and another V/s. The JointCommissioner of Income Tax.: 2 :
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING THISDAY, Dr.VINEET KOTHARI. J, DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
J U D G M E N T
Mr. Y V RAVIRAJ, Adv. for appellants.SMT. JINITA CHATTERJEE, Adv. for respondent.
1. Learned Counsel for the Revenue submits that inview of the Circular No.21/2015 dated 10.12.2015 issued bythe CBDT, the present appeal filed by the Revenue hasRevenue stake of less than monetary limits ofRs.20,00,000/- and therefore, he may be permittedtowithdraw the present appeal.
2. Opposite counsel for the Assesee has no objection to
the same.
3. Accordingly, the present appeal of Revenue isdismissed as withdrawn. No Costs.
Sd/-JUDGE
VB/-
Sd/-
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.