Ita/100003/2021 Of M/S Karnataka Vikas Grameena Bank v. Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
12 Nov 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karhcdharwad
Parties
Ita/100003/2021 Of M/S Karnataka Vikas Grameena Bank v. Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
12 Nov 2021
Assessment year(s)
2014-15
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/100003/2021 Of M/S Karnataka Vikas Grameena Bank v. Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: 4 Wherefore,|InVICWoftheabove|submissions the Appellant numbly prays|this Hon’ble Court may be pleased fo)permit tne Appellant to withdraw tne)above Income Tax Appeal with liberty to)revive, in case, if the dispute is not settled|under the scheme the Direct Tax Vivad Se|Vishwas Act, 2020 in the inte...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA|DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 12 DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2021.
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S. SUNIL DUTT YADAV.
AND
THE HON BLE MS.JUSTICE JI.M. KHAZI
I.T.A.NO.L100003/202
BEIWEEN®
M/S KARNATAKA VIKAS GRAMEEN BANK,REP. BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER, CHANDRASHEKAR D. MORO,HEAD OFFICE, H.O. BUILDING,BELAGAUM ROAD,DHARWAD.
(BY SRI SHASHANK S. HEGDE, ADV.)
AND «
—. APPELLAN|
ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX)CIRCLE 2(1), CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING,HUBBALLI.
... RESPONDENTTHIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OFTHE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 PRAYING TO FORMULATE THESUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW AS STATED ABOVE ANDANSWER THE SAME IN FAVOUR OF THE APPELLANT AND.TO ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE FINDINGS TO.THE EXTENT AGAINST THE ASSESSEE IN THE COMMON.
2
ORDER.PASSEDBYTHE|INCOME|TAXAPPELLATETRIBUNAL, BENGALURUCBENCHIN|ITANOS.2054/Bang/2017 FOR THE A.Y. 2014-15 VUDE|ANNEXURES-A.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV J,, DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
The counsel for the appellant has filed a memo,which reads as follows:
1.The above named Appellant has_ filedIncome Tax Appeal under Section 260A ofthe Income Tax Act, 1961 challenging tne|order passed by the Income Tax Appellate|Tribunal,BangaloreBenchInTTA|No.2054/Bang/201/7 dated 10.09.2020 forthe Assessment Year 2014-15.
2.The Appellant filed Form-1 and Form-2 for|declaration and undertaking for paying|taxes on disputed income undaer_ tnScheme named [The Direct Tax Vivad SeVisnwas Act, 2020 for the Assessment.Year.
3.Thereafter, the Principal Commissioner for|Income-Tax, HubliISSUCGForm-3certificate under sub-section (1) of Section|
5 of the Direct Tax Vivad Se Viswas Act,|2020 dated 19.04.2021, after verifying|Form-1 and Form-2. Copy of the Form-3|IS enclosed hnerewith for this Hon’bliCourt’s reference and records.
4 Wherefore,|InVICWoftheabove|submissions the Appellant numbly prays|this Hon’ble Court may be pleased fo)permit tne Appellant to withdraw tne)above Income Tax Appeal with liberty to)revive, in case, if the dispute is not settled|under the scheme the Direct Tax Vivad Se|Vishwas Act, 2020 in the interest ofjustice|and egulty.|
In light of the same, appeal is dismissed as
withdrawn.
Sd/-JUDGE|
Sd/-JUDGE.
Naa |
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.