Ita/100018/2019 Of Sri.manne Srinivas v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court
07 Feb 2024 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karhcdharwad
Parties
Ita/100018/2019 Of Sri.manne Srinivas v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
07 Feb 2024
Assessment year(s)
2014-15
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/100018/2019 Of Sri.manne Srinivas v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Appeal stands dismissed for non-compliance of office objections.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
K MSOMASHEKARDigitally signedby K MSOMASHEKARDate:2024.02.0910:29:27+0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 7 DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S G PANDIT
AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K V ARAVIND
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 100018 OF 2019
BETWEEN:
SRI. MANNE SRINIVAS S/O. VEDASWAMI,AGE: 59 YEARS, OCC: PWD CONTRACTOR, KATAIAH CAMP, GANGAVATHI TALUK, KOPPAL DISTRICT-583268. PAN NO.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. PRAVEEN P. TARIKAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD -1, HOSPETE TALUK, BELLARY - 583 102.
2.THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,AAYAKAR BHAVAN, SADEM ROAD, KALABURAGI - 585 105.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. Y.V. RAVIRAJ, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2)
THIS ITA IS FILED U/SEC.260A OF THE INCOME-TAX ACT, 1961, PRAYING TO, A. FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW AS STATED ABOVE. B. ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ‘SMC-A BENCH BENGALURU IN ITA NO. 1299/BANG/2018 DATED 07.09.2018 CONFIRMING THE ORDER OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) GULBARGA DATED 26.02.2018 AND THE ORDER PASSED BY THE (ASSESSING OFFICER) INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1 HOSAPETE DATED 23.12.2016 PASSED FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2014-15 AND ETC.,
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, S G PANDIT, J., PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
This Court on 9.11.2021, granted two weeks’ time to comply office objections. Thereafter, on 13.09.2023, while admitting the appeal, four weeks’ time was granted to comply office objections. Till this date, office objections are not complied.
Learned counsel for the appellant prays for further time to comply office objections. There is no justification to grant further time. Appeal stands dismissed for non-compliance of office objections.
Sd/-JUDGE
Sd/- JUDGE
JTR LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 20
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.