Ita/100033/2016 Of The Principal Commissioenr Of Income Tax v. M/S Siddashri Pattin Souharda
High Court
05 Jul 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karhcdharwad
Parties
Ita/100033/2016 Of The Principal Commissioenr Of Income Tax v. M/S Siddashri Pattin Souharda
Date of order
05 Jul 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/100033/2016 Of The Principal Commissioenr Of Income Tax v. M/S Siddashri Pattin Souharda, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Accordingly,the appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKADHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 5 DAY OF JULY 2016
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.G.RAMESH
AND
THE HON’‘BLE MRS. JUSTICE RATHNAKALI.T.A. NO.100033/2016
BETWEEN
1. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF
INCOME TAX,
DR. B.R.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
BELAGAVI.|
2. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,
WARD-1, VIJAYAPUR.
APPELLANTS|
(BY SRI Y.V.RAVIRAJ, ADVOCATE)
AND=
M/S SIDDASHRI PATTIN SOUHARDASAHAKARI NIYAMITH,|S.S ROAD, VIJAYAPUR.
PAN: AAAJS33/2F
RESPONDENT
THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER SECTION JZ60A OF THE INCOMTAX ACT, 1961, PRAYING TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIALQUESTION OF LAW STATED ABOVE AND ALLOW THE APPEAL ANDSET ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE [INCOME TAAPPELLATETRIBUNAL, “ACBENCHBANGALORE.IN|LIANO.254/BANG/2015, DATED 30.06.2015 AND CONFIRM THEORDER PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1,VIJAYAPUR, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THISTTACOMINGONFOR.ORDERSTHISDAY,H.G. RAMESH J)ADELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
H.G.RAMESH, J. (Oral)!
This appeal is listed for orders re.non-compliance ofoffice objections. However, learned counsel appearing forthe appellants fairly submits that the question of law raisedin this appeal is answered against the appellants by thisCourt in I.T.A. No.100029/2015 (D.D. 06.01.2016), andtherefore, this appeal is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly,the appeal is dismissed.
Appeal dismissed.
Sd/-JUDGE
Sd/-JUDGE
Kms
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.