Case LawHigh Court › Ita/100038/2016 Of The Principal Commiss...

Ita/100038/2016 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri. Bramhanath Co-Op Credit Society Ltd

High Court 05 Jul 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karhcdharwad
Parties
Ita/100038/2016 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri. Bramhanath Co-Op Credit Society Ltd
Date of order
05 Jul 2016
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/100038/2016 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri. Bramhanath Co-Op Credit Society Ltd, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Accordingly,the appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKADHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 5 DAY OF JULY 2016 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.G.RAMESH AND THE HON’‘BLE MRS. JUSTICE RATHNAKALI.T.A. NO.100038/2016 BETWEEN 1. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DR. B.R.AMBEDKAR ROAD, BELAGAVI.| 2. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,NIPANI. DIST. BELAGAVI.NIPANI. DIST. BELAGAVI. APPELLANTS (BY SRI Y.V.RAVIRAJ, ADVOCATE) ANID SHRI BASAWESHWAR CO-OP CREDITSOCIETY LTD., SOMWAR PETH,CHIKKODI, DIST. BELAGAVI.AAAAB 1335 Q . RESPONDENT THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 2J60A OF THE INCOMTAX ACT, 1961, PRAYING TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIALQUESTION OF LAW STATED ABOVE AND ALLOW THE APPEAL ANDSET ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE [INCOME TAAPPELLATETRIBUNAL,PANAJLBENCH,PANAJL IN|ITANO.301/PNJ/2015, DATED 05.10.2015 AND CONFIRM THE ORDERPASSED BY THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, NIPANI. THISLITACOMINGONFOR.ORDERSTHISDAY,H.G. RAMESH J.TDELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT H.G.RAMESH, J. (Oral)( This appeal is listed for orders re.non-compliance ofoffice objections. However, learned counsel appearing forthe appellants fairly submits that the question of law raisedin this appeal is answered against the appellants by thisCourt in I.T.A. No.100029/2015 (D.D. 06.01.2016), andtherefore, this appeal is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly,the appeal is dismissed. Appeal dismissed. Sd/-JUDGE Sd/-JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan