Case LawHigh Court › Ita/100048/2018 Of The Pr Commissioner O...

Ita/100048/2018 Of The Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Abhaykumar Bharmgouda Patil

High Court 17 Sep 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karhcdharwad
Parties
Ita/100048/2018 Of The Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Abhaykumar Bharmgouda Patil
Date of order
17 Sep 2019
Assessment year(s)
2009-10
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/100048/2018 Of The Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Abhaykumar Bharmgouda Patil, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Accordingly, appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 17 DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2019 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.N. SATYANARAYANA AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE P.G.M. PATIL I.T.A. No. 100048/2018 BETWEEN 1.THE PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR ROAD, OPP: CIVIL HOSPITAL, BELAGAVI. DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR ROAD, OPP: CIVIL HOSPITAL, BELAGAVI. 2.ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, DR.B.R. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BELAGAVI. CIRCLE-1, DR.B.R. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BELAGAVI. ...APPELLANTS (By SRI. Y.V.RAVIRAJ, ADV.) AND ABHAYKUMAR BHARMGOUDA PATIL, 24, MALINI, BASUVAN GALLI, HOSUR, SHAHPUR, BELAGAVI-560003, PAN: ACAPP 6762 G. (RESPONDENT – NOTICE UNSERVED) ... RESPONDENT ITA FILED UNDER SECTION 260A OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961, PRAYING TO A)FORMULATE THE SUSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW AS STATED ABOVE; B)ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PANAJI BENCH, PANAJI IN ITA NO.35/Panaji/2018 DATED 13.04.2018 AND CONFIRM THE ORDER DATED 28.03.2014 PASSED BY THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX OFFICER, CIRCLE-I, BELAGAVI FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009-10. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, S.N.SATYANARAYANA,J, DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT This appeal is in challenge to the revenue order granted in favour of the assessee. The learned counsel for the appellants would bring to the notice of this Court that in the light of recent circular bearing No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019, the present appeal does not survive. In view of the pecuniary limitation prescribed under the aforesaid circular, is excess of challenge to the order impugned. Hence, he seeks permission to withdraw the appeal filed by the revenue. Memo is accepted. Appellants are permitted to withdraw the appeal. Accordingly, appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. SD/- JUDGE SD/- JUDGE KGK
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan