Ita/100052/2018 Of M/S The Kangod Group Multi v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court
05 Jul 2019 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karhcdharwad
Parties
Ita/100052/2018 Of M/S The Kangod Group Multi v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
05 Jul 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ita/100052/2018 Of M/S The Kangod Group Multi v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Appeals stand dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 05 DAY OF JULY, 2019
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR
AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE BELLUNKE A.S.
INCOME TAX APPEAL Nos.100052-53/2018
BETWEEN:
M/S. THE KANGOD GROUP MULTI PURPOSE CO-OPE SOCIETY LIMITED, REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT, SRI. GANAPATI SUBRAY HEGDE, YADALLI POST, SIRSI-581403, UTTARA KANNADA. PAN:
... APPELLANT
(BY SRI. A SHANKAR, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR SRI. SHASHANK S HEGDE, ADVOCATE)
AND:
THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, “KALPATARU”, CHURCH ROAD, SIRSI-581401.
... RESPONDENT
THESE APPEALS ARE FILED UNDER SECTION 260A OF THE INCOME ACT 1961 PRAYING TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW AS STATED ABOVE AND ANSWER THE SAME IN FAVOUR OF THE APPELLANT AND TO ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET-ASIDE THE FINDINGS TO THE EXTENT AGAINST THE APPELLANT IN THE ORDER PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL SMC “C” BENCH IN ITA NO.2793 AND 2794/BANG/2017 DATED 4.5.2018 FOR ASSESSMENT YEARS 2010-11 AND 2012-13 RESPECTIVELY.
THESE APPEALS COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ARAVIND KUMARJ., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel appearing for appellant files a memo seeking withdrawal of appeals.
Memo is placed on records. Appeals stand dismissed as withdrawn.
SD/- JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE
JTR
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.