Case LawHigh Court › Ita/100054/2018 Of M/S.hirekerur And Bya...

Ita/100054/2018 Of M/S.hirekerur And Byadgi Taluk v. The Income Tax Officer

High Court 03 Feb 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karhcdharwad
Parties
Ita/100054/2018 Of M/S.hirekerur And Byadgi Taluk v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
03 Feb 2021
Assessment year(s)
2010-2011
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Ita/100054/2018 Of M/S.hirekerur And Byadgi Taluk v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
- | -| IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA.DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 3 DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2021. PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICEG.NARENDAR| AND| THE HON‘'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR I.T.A.No.100054/2018 BETWEEN: M/S.HIREKERUR and BYADGI TALUKMAHILA SUPPLEMENTARY andPRODUCTION CENTRE,REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT,SMT.SHARADA H. NADGIR,CHIKKERUR ROAD, HIREKERUR TALUK, HAVERI DISTRICT-581111,PAN: AAAAH4800]._.. APPELLANT(BY SHRI.A.SHANKAR,SHRI M.LAVA,SHRI SHASHANK HEGDE,SHRI ANNAMALAI ANDSHRI S.V.RAVISHANKAR, ADV.)AND:THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD-1,HAVERI-581110.—. RESPONDENT(BY SHRI.Y.V.RAVIRAJ, ADV.)THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 2JZ60A OF THINCOME|TAX,|1961,PRAYINGTO|FORMULATETHE|SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW AS STATED ABOVE ANDANSWER THE SAME IN FAVOUR OF THE APPELLANT AND TO)ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE FINDINGS J7O THE - 92 - EXTENT AGAINST THE APPELLANT IN THE ORDER PASSED BY|THEINCOME|TAXAPPELLATE.TRIBUNAL,‘CBENCH,|BANGALORE IN ITA No.1565/BANG/2016 DATED 01.06.2018|FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2010-2011 (VIDE ANNEXURE-A)|AND ETC.,, THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS’ DAY,G.NARENDAR J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT A memo is preferred praying leave of the Court to withdraw the appeal with liberty to revive the appeal in the event|the dispute is not settled under the Scheme named Direct Tax| Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. Memo its taken on record, Appeal is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to approach this Court in the event of the dispute not being settled under the Scheme called the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. Sd/-JUDGE| Sd/-JUDGE|
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan