Ita/100056/2015 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. North Western Karnataka
High Court
18 Oct 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karhcdharwad
Parties
Ita/100056/2015 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. North Western Karnataka
Date of order
18 Oct 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ita/100056/2015 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. North Western Karnataka, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
Dated this the 18[th] day of October 2019
Present
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
and
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE P.G.M. PATIL
I.T.A. No.100056 of 2015
Between:
1. The Commissioner of Income Tax, Navanagar, Hubli. Navanagar, Hubli.
2. The Assistant Commissioner of
Income Tax, Circle 3(1), Navanagar, Hubli.
…Appellants
(By Sri. Y.V. Raviraj, Advocate)
A N D :
North Western Karnataka Road Transport Corporation, Central Office, Gokul Road, Hubli-580030.
PAN: .
...Respondent
(By Sri. H.R. Kambiyavar, Advocate for
Sri. S. Parthasarathi, Advocate)
This ITA is filed under 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 praying to formulate the substantial question of law; and to allow the appeal and set aside the orders passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, A Bench, Bangalore in ITA No.1739/BANG/2013, dated 14.11.2014
and confirm the order passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-3(1), Hubli.
This ITA coming on for Orders this day, ALOK ARADHE, J, made the following:
ORDER
Mr. Y.V. Raviraj, learned counsel for the Revenue. Mr. H.R.Kambiyavar, learned counsel for the assessee.
Learned counsel for the Revenue files a memo seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the appeal. Memo is taken on record.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- JUDGE
Sd/- JUDGE
Kms
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue