Ita/100065/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Chandrashekar Shivalingappa Bali
High Court
16 Dec 2015 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karhcdharwad
Parties
Ita/100065/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Chandrashekar Shivalingappa Bali
Date of order
16 Dec 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/100065/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Chandrashekar Shivalingappa Bali, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THB HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKADHARWAD BENCH
DATEBD THIS THE 1 DAY OF DECEMBER, 2015
PRESENT
THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER
AND
THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMARITA No.100065 OF 2014
BETWEEN:
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXDR B R AMBEDKAR ROAD,BELGAUM_ APPBRLLLANT
(By Sri. Y V RAVIRAJ, ADV.)
ANT
CHANDRASHBKAR SHIVALINGAPPA BALIPROP SHRI JAGADISH TRADING CO.BAZAR ROAD, MUNOLI, TO: SAUNDATTIDIST: BELGAUM, PAN AAWPB44/77E.. RESPONDENT
(By Sri. H R KAMBIYAVAR, ADV.)
THIS [TA IS FILED UNDER SECTION QJOOA OF TH“INCOME-TAX ACT, 1961 AGAINST ORDER PASSED INITA.NO.33/PNJ/2013 DTD:28.03.2014 ON THE FILE OF THEINCOMETAXAPPELLATE,TRIBUNAL, PANAJIBENCH,ALLOWING THR APPBAL FILED BY THE ASSBSSEBE
THIS ITA COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,P.S.DINESH KUMAR, J.IDHLIVERE]THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
ori Y.V.Raviraj, learned counsel appearing for theappellants submits that he does not press this appealin view of the circular No.21/2015 in F.No.279/Misc. 142/2007-ITJU(Pt), dated 10.12.201
a2The submission of the learned counsel
appearing for the appellants is placed on record. Theappeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
Sd/-
JUDGE.
YN,
Sd/-
JUDGE.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue