Ita/100072/2015 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. The Nagarbail Salt-Owners
High Court
19 Nov 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karhcdharwad
Parties
Ita/100072/2015 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. The Nagarbail Salt-Owners
Date of order
19 Nov 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/100072/2015 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. The Nagarbail Salt-Owners, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
DATBD THIS THE 19 DAY OF NOVEMBER 2Z0O1
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK B.HINCHIGERI
ANDI
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMAR
IL.T.A.NO.100072/201
BETWEEN
1.THR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCHNTRAL REVBENUB BUILDINATTAVAR, MANGALURUCHNTRAL REVBENUB BUILDINATTAVAR, MANGALURU
2.THR INCOME TAX OFFICERWARD-2,SANTERI KRUJAPA BUILDINGHABBUWADA, KARWARWARD-2,SANTERI KRUJAPA BUILDINGHABBUWADA, KARWAR
(BY SRI Y V RAVIRAJ, ADVOCATE)
_. APPKBLANTS
AN]
THR NAGARBAIL SALT-OWNERSCO-OPERATIVE SOCIBTY LIMITBDSANIKATTE, GOKARNA, KUMTA-5381 32
(BY SRI ASHOK KULKARNI &SRI H R KAMBIYAVAR, ADVOCATES)
... RESPONDENT
THIS ITA IS FILED U/S.2600A OF THE INCOME-TAXACT 1961, PRAYING TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIALQUESTION OF LAW STATED ABOVE AND TO ALLOW THE
APPBRAL AND SBT ASIDE THR ORDERS PASSKBD BY TINCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PANAJI BENCH,PANAJI, IN ITA NO.2559/PNJ/2014, DTD: 23.01.2015 FOTHRE ASSEHESSMENIT YRKAR 2O10-11 AND CONFIRORDER PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2,SANTERI KRUJAPA BUILDING, HABBUWAD, KARWAR.
THIS ITA HAVING BEBEBN HBARD AND RESERVEFOR JUDGMENT, THIS DAY,P.S.DINESH KUMAR. J.PRONOUNCEDTHERE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
This appeal was presented by the Revenuechallenging the common order dated 23.1.20195, iL.T.A.Nos.252 to 256 & 377/PNJ/2014 so tar as itrelates to ITA 255/PNJ/2014 for the assessment yearA2O1O-11
2. The learned standing Counsel for the Revenue
and the learned Counsel for the assessee were heard onthe following substantial question of law;
“Whethertherespondentsocietyassessed to tax on its income as ‘person’ asdefined under Section 2(31) of Income Tax Act,1961, is entitled to claim exemption over itsprofits paid to its members and claim it as
expenditure in the accounts before offering theprofitfor tax?”
3. By a detailed order of even date, this Court hasdismissed I.T.A.No.100067/2015 for the assessmentyear 2006-07. Following the said judgment, this appealis alsodismissedwithout any order as to costs
od/-JUDGE
od/-JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.