Case Law › High Court › Ita/1001/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Ita/1001/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. K.p.karthikeyan

High Court 07 Aug 2009 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · highcourtofkerala

Parties

Date of order

07 Aug 2009

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Ita/1001/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. K.p.karthikeyan, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM FRIDAY, THE 7TH AUGUST 2009 / 16TH SRAVANA 1931 ITA.No. 1001 of 2009() ---------------------- ITA.610/COCH/2004 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH .................... APPELLANT ----------------------------- THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,COCHIN. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SR.COUNSEL, GOI(TAXES) SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX RESPONDENT(S): --------------- SRI.K.P.KARTHIKEYAN, KURAVANPARAMBIL,UDAYAMPEROOR,TRIPUNITHURA. THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/08/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR &C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JJ. ....................................................................I.T. Appeal No.1001 of 2009 ....................................................................Dated this the 7th day of August, 2009. JUDGMENT Ramachandran Nair, J. Since we have dismissed the connected assessment appeal (I.T.A.No.811/2009), this appeal being the one filed against penalty order isalso dismissed. C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIRJudge pms C.K.ABDUL REHIM Judge

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.