Case LawHigh Court › Ita/100159/2015 Of The Principal Commiss...

Ita/100159/2015 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sri. Santosh B Rattu

High Court 18 Jul 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karhcdharwad
Parties
Ita/100159/2015 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sri. Santosh B Rattu
Date of order
18 Jul 2018
Assessment year(s)
2006-07
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/100159/2015 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sri. Santosh B Rattu, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THR HIGH COURT OFR KARNATAKADHARWAD BENCH| DATEBD THIS THE 1 DAY OF JULY QJOI1L PRESENT. THERE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICG.NARENDAR.ANT) THR HON’BLEB MR. JUSTICBK B.M.SHYAM PRAS ITA NO.1OO1599/201 BEIWEEN 1.THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF. INCOME TAX, DR. B.R.AMBEDKAR ROAD, BELGAUM.. D |ITO, WARD-2(1),|BELGAUM.BELGAUM. (BY SRI Y.V.RAVIRAJ, ADVOCATE.) AND SRI SANTOSH B. RATTOU217, HINDAWADI, BELGAUM. (BY SRI H.R.KAMBIYAVAR, ADVOCATE.) ~.. APPELLANTS. —.. RBSPONDENT THIS.INCOME.TAXAPPHALIS|KRIILHUNDER|SECTION 260A OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 19601, PRAYING TO ALLOW THR APPBRAL AND SET ASIDB THR ORDERSPASSED BY THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,|PANAJI BENCH, PANAJI, IN ITA NO.O1/PNJ/2014, DATED|16.6.2015, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2006-07 AND.RBSTORB THR ORDBR PASSBHD BY THR INCOMB TAXOFFICER, WARD-2(1), BELGAUM, ETC.,. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING,THIS|DAY,SRIG.NARENDAR,J,|DRLIVEREDTHE.FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Heard the learned counsel for the appellants. oDLearned counsel for the appellants files amemo in the Court dated 18.7.2018 whereby placingreliance on the Circular No.3/2018, dated 11[/0]July2018, the appellant department desires to withdrawthe appeal in the light of the fact that quantum ofthe disputed facts is less than fifty lakhs and thatthe circular 1S issued in terms of section JO8A ot theIncome Tax Act, 19601 and directed withdrawal ofsuch appeals. Copy of circular No.3/2018 is alsoplaced before the Court. | ?���+:4�96�/,A+2�42�-+34-.���334-.92>1=�/0+� ,88+,1�6/,2.6�.96:966+.�,6�24/�8-+66+.�� ���������� ��������� �-A!�
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan