Ita/100185/2015 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Daivadnya Sahakara Bank Niyamit
High Court
15 Jun 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karhcdharwad
Parties
Ita/100185/2015 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Daivadnya Sahakara Bank Niyamit
Date of order
15 Jun 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ita/100185/2015 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Daivadnya Sahakara Bank Niyamit, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 100047/2015 and 100048-49/2015.Hence, this appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
ITA No.100185 OF 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKADHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 15[th]DAY OF JUNE 2016PRESENT
THE HON’'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.G.RAMES
THE HON’'BLE MRS. JUSTICE RATHNAKAL
LTA No.LOQ1L85 OF ZOL
BETWEEN
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXDR.B.R.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BELAGAVI
APPELLANT
(By Sri Y.V. RAVIRAJ, ADV.)
AND
Daivadnya Sanakara Bank Niyamit,|1169, Saraf Galli, Snanapur,Belgavi.PAN AAAADO3278.., RESPONDENT
THIS ITA IS FILED U/S.260A OF THE INCOME-TAX ACT1961,PRAYINGTO](a) FORMULATE.THESUBSTANTIALQUESTION OF LAW STATED ABOVE (b) ALLOW THE APPEAL ANDSET ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE [INCOME TAAPPELLATETRIBUNAL,PANAJLBENCH,|PANAJI,IN|ITANO.71/PNJ/2015, DTD:28.07.2015 AND CONFIRM THE ORDERPASSED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BELAGAVI, INTHE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THISTTACOMINGONFOR.ORDERSTHISDAY,H.G. RAMESH J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
H.G.RAMESH, J. (Oral))
This appeal is listed for orders regarding noncompliance of an office objection. However, learnedcounsel appearing for the appellant submits that thequestion of law raised in this appeal is answered against theappellant by this Court in the judgment dated 16.12.2015rendered in ITA Nos. 100047/2015 and 100048-49/2015.Hence, this appeal is dismissed.
Appeal dismissed.
Sd/-JUDGE
Sd/-JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue