Ita/100186/2015 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri. Ashok M Kulkarni
High Court
16 Dec 2015 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karhcdharwad
Parties
Ita/100186/2015 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri. Ashok M Kulkarni
Date of order
16 Dec 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/100186/2015 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri. Ashok M Kulkarni, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THB HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
DHARWAD BENCH
DATEBD THIS THE 1 DAY OF DECEMBER, 2015
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER
AND
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMARITA No. J1GQ186 OF 20
BRIWEHEN
THE COMMIssIONER OF INCOME TAX,DR. B.R.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,BBLAGAVI.
APPRLLANT
(BY SRI Y.V.RAVIRAJ, ADV.)
ANT
SHRI ASHOK.M.KULKARNI,DEVELOPMENT OFFICER,LIC OF INDIA, CONGRESS ROAD,TILAKWADI, BELAGAVI,PAN:ACOPKO719E.
_.. RESPONDE
THIS TIA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 2Q00A OF THINCOME TAX ACT, 1961 TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSEDBY THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,PANAJI BENCH,PANAJI, IN ITA NO.284/PNJ/2014, DTD:08.07.2015 AND ETC.
THIS ITA COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,P.S.DINESH KUMAR, J.2DELIVEREDTHERE FOLLOWIN
JUDGMENT
ori Y.V.Raviraj, learned counsel appearing for the
appellants submits that he does not press this appealin view of the circular No.21/2019 in F.No.279/Misc. 142/2007-ITJU(Pt), dated 10.12.201
? The submission of the learned counsel
appearing for the appellants is placed on record. Theappeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
Sd/-
JUDGE.
Sd/-
JUDGE.
KLY/
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.