Ita/100197/2015 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Lokopayogi Illakhe And Karnataka Neeravari
High Court
16 Dec 2015 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karhcdharwad
Parties
Ita/100197/2015 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Lokopayogi Illakhe And Karnataka Neeravari
Date of order
16 Dec 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ita/100197/2015 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Lokopayogi Illakhe And Karnataka Neeravari, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THB HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
DHARWAD BENCH
DATEBD THIS THE 1 DAY OF DECEMBER, 2015
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER
AND
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMARITA No. J1QGQ197 OF 2
BRIWEHEN
1.THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,DR BR AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,BBLAGAVI.DR BR AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,BBLAGAVI.
2.THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD - 2(3), BELAGAVI.WARD - 2(3), BELAGAVI.
(BY SRI. Y V RAVIRAJ, ADV.)
_.... APPELLANTS
ANT)
M/S LOKOPAYOGI ILLAKHE AND KARNATAKANEERAVARI NAWAKARI PATTIN SANGH NIYAMITH,NEERAVARI NAWAKARI PATTIN SANGH NIYAMITH,
1 FORT, BELAGAVI,
PAN: AAAAL 1333 J
..... RESPONDENT
THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER SECTION QJ6O0A OF T“INCOME-TAX ACT, 1961 PRAYING TO (a) FORMULATE THESUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW STATED ABOVE; (b) ALLOWTHERE APPEAL AND SEI ASIDE THK ORDERS PASSED BY T
INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PANAJI BENCH PANAuI,IN ITA NO.34/PNJ/2015, DTD: 19.07.2015 AND CONFIRM THEORDER PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(1),BELAGAVI.
THIS ITA COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,P.S.DINESH KUMAR, J.2DELIVEREDTHERE FOLLOWIN
JUDGMENT
ori Y.V.Raviraj, learned counsel appearing for theappellants submits that he does not press this appealin view of the circular No.21/2015 in F.No.279/Misc. 142/2007-ITJU(Pt), dated 10.12.201
? The submission of the learned counselappearing for the appellants is placed on record. Theappeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
Sd/-JUDGE.
Naa
Sd/-JUDGE.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.