Case LawHigh Court › Ita/1007/2017 Of B.s. Krishnamurthy v. D...

Ita/1007/2017 Of B.s. Krishnamurthy v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 31 Mar 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/1007/2017 Of B.s. Krishnamurthy v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
31 Mar 2021
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/1007/2017 Of B.s. Krishnamurthy v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: For the reasons stated in the memo, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to revive / restore the appeal, if need arises.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 31 DAY OF MARCH, 2021 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL I.T.A. NO.1007/2017 BETWEEN: B.S.KRISHNAMURTHY NO.27, 17 CROSS, I MAIN, B.K.NAGAR, OPP: LIC COLONY, YESHWANTHPUR, BENGALURU - 560 022 PAN: . (BY SRI SHIVAPRASAD E., ADVOCATE) ... APPELLANT AND: DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-9(1), 3 FLOOR, JEEVAN SAMPIGE, LIC BUILDNG, SAMPIGE ROAD, MALLESHWARAM, BANGALORE 560 003. ... RESPONDENT (BY SRI DILIP KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR SRI K.V.ARAVIND, ADVOCATE) - - - THIS I.T.A. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961 PRAYING THIS HON'BLE COURT TO I.FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED ABOVE OR FRAME SUCH OTHER QUESTION OF QUESTIONS AS THIS HON’BLE COURT DEEM IT FIT; II.CALL FOR THE ENTIRE LOWER COURT/APPELLATE TRIBUNAL/APPELLATE AUTHORITY/ASSESSING OFFICER RECORDS PERTAINING TO THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED:29/11/2011, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009- 2010, PERTAINING TO THE APPELLANT COMPANY BEARING PAN NO. , FROM THE RESPONDENT NO.01 AUTHORITY AND ETC., THIS I.T.A. COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, ALOK ARADHE J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Sri Shivaprasad E., learned counsel for the appellant. Sri Dilip Kumar, learned counsel for Sri K.V.Aravind, learned counsel for the respondents. Learned counsel for the assessee has filed a memo seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the appeal. The aforesaid memo is taken on record. For the reasons stated in the memo, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to revive / restore the appeal, if need arises. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE nvj
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan