Case LawHigh Court › Ita/1008/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Ita/1008/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Fr Mullers Charitable Institutions

High Court 13 Oct 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/1008/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Fr Mullers Charitable Institutions
Date of order
13 Oct 2014
Assessment year(s)
2000-2001
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Ita/1008/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Fr Mullers Charitable Institutions, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 1168/BNG/2007 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2000-2001 WITH A PRAYER TO ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE ITAT, BANGALORE AND ETC.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 13 DAY OF OCTOBER, 2014 PRESENT THE HON’BLE Mr. JUSTICE N. KUMAR AND THE HON’BLE Mr. JUSTICE B. MANOHAR I.T.A. No. 1008/2008 BETWEEN : -------------- 1. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX C.R. BUILDING ATTAVAR MANGALORE. 2. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD – 2(1) MANGALORE. … APPELLANTS (BY Sri. E.I. SANMATHI, ADV.) AND : ------- Fr. MULLERS CHARITABLE INSTITUTIONS No. 17/21-1488/3 KAMKANADY MANGALORE. … RESPONDENT (BY Sri. S. PARTHASARATHI, ADV.) --- THIS I.T.A. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF I.T. ACT ARISNG OUT OF ORDER DATED 20.06.2008 – ANNEXURE A PASSED IN ITA No. 1168/BNG/2007 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2000-2001 WITH A PRAYER TO ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE ITAT, BANGALORE AND ETC. THIS I.T.A. COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS DAY, N. KUMAR, J, DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING; J U D G M E N T The Commissioner of Income Tax, exercising his powers under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 had issued certain directions to the assessing authority to make proper assessment. Accordingly, the assessing authority passed assessment order. Against the said order, the assessee preferred an appeal to the Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals) who confirmed the said order. Against that order, the revenue preferred an appeal to the Tribunal and the Tribunal has dismissed the said appeal. Against the order of dismissal, the revenue is in appeal. 2. It is not in dispute that challenging the order of the Commissioner of Income-Tax under Section 263, the assessee preferred an appeal to the Tribunal. The Tribunal set aside the said order. Against that order, the revenue had preferred an appeal before this Court which came to be dismissed. Therefore, the entire order which is the subject-matter of these proceedings is one without jurisdiction and accordingly, there is no merit in this appeal. The Tribunal was justified in setting aside the order. Ordered accordingly. Sri. Parthasarathy, learned counsel is permitted to file vakalath within four weeks from today. Sd/- JUDGE. LRS. Sd/- JUDGE.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan