Ita/1009/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. F Mullers Charitable Institutions
High Court
07 Jul 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/1009/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. F Mullers Charitable Institutions
Date of order
07 Jul 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/1009/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. F Mullers Charitable Institutions, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THB HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALOREDATEBD THIS THE [th]DAY OF JULY 2014
PRESEHBN
THR HON BLE MR. JUSTICE N. KUMAR.
AND
THR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICK B. MANOHAR|
ITA No.1009 OF 2OO8
BETWEEN;
1.The Commissioner of Income-Tax,C.R.Building,Attavar, Mangalore.2.lhe Income-Tax Officer,Ward-2(1),Mangalore._ APPKRLLANTS
(By Sri.E.I. Sanmathi, Advocate)
AND:
F. Mullers Charitable Institutions,No.17/21-1488/3,Kamkanady,Mangalore._ RBSPONDENT
(By Sri.S. Parthasarathi, Advocate)|
-Q-O-O-O-O-
This ITA is filed under Section 260-A of I.T. Act,|1961 arising out of Order dated 20.6.2008 Annexure-Apassed in ITA.No.1169/BNG/2007 for the Assessment
Year 2001-02, praying to formulate the substantialquestions of law stated therein and to allow the appealand set aside the order passed by the ITAT, Bangalore1n ITA.No.1169/BNG/2007dated20.6.2008andconfirm the order passed by the Assessing Officer.
This appeal coming on for hearing this day,N. KUMAR, J.delivered the following:-
JUDGMENT
The Commissioner of Income Tax, exercising hispowers under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.had issued certain directions to the assessing authorityto make proper assessment. Accordingly, the assessingauthority passed assessment order. Against the saidorder, the assessee preferred an appeal to theCommissioner of Income-Tax(Appeals) who confirmedthe said order. Against that order, the revenue preferredan appeal to the Tribunal and the Tribunal hasdismissed the said appeal. Against the order ofdismissal, the revenue is in appeal.
D2 It is not in dispute that challenging the order
of the Commissioner of Income-Tax under Section 263,the assessee preferred an appeal to the Tribunal. The
Tribunal set aside the said order. Against that order,the revenue had preferred an appeal before this Courtwhich came to be dismissed. Therefore, the entire orderwhich is the subject-matter of these proceedings is onewithout jurisdiction and accordingly, there is no meritin this appeal. The Tribunal was justified in setting theorder.
Ordered accordingly.
Sd/-
JUDGE.
Sd/-|
JUDGE.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.