Ita/101/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri Lalji L Patel
High Court
07 Nov 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/101/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri Lalji L Patel
Date of order
07 Nov 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/101/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri Lalji L Patel, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THB HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATEBD THIS THE 0 DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2014
PRESENT_
THR HON' BLE MR.JUSTICK N.KUMAR
ANT)
THR HON' BLE MR.JUSTICK B.MANOHAR
ITA NO.101 OF 2009 |
c/w.ITA NO.102/2009 AND ITA NO.103/2009
ITA NO 101 OF 2009
BBRITWEH
1.THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCENTRAL CIRCLE, |C.R.BUILDINGQUEENS ROAD, BANGALORE
”.THR ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2)C.R.BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD|BANGALORE —. APPELLANTS |
(BY SRI.K V ARAVIND - ADV).
ANT)
SHRI LALJI L PATELVIJAYALAKSHMI NILAYANO.14, 1ST CROSSBIM LAYOUT, II STAGEBANGALORE —. RBSPONDBENT
(BY M/S. A SHANKAR & M LAVA — ADVS. )
|
THIS ITA IS FILED U/S.260-A OF I.T.ACT, 1961)ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 31-10-2008 PASSED INIT(SS)A NO.26/BNG/2008, FOR THE ASSESSMENT PERIOD01.04.1996 TO 03.04.2002, PRAYING THAT THIS HON'BLECOURT MAY BE PLEASED TO:
I. FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW|STATED THEREIN,Ill ALLOW THR APPKRKAL AND SET ASIDB THERE ORPASSED.BY|THERITAT,|BANGALORE,INIT(SS)ANO.26/BNG/2008,DATED 31-10-2008 CONFIRMING THE|ORDER OF THR APPKRHLLATE COMMISSIONBR ANDCONFIRM THR ORDER PASSKHD BY THR ASSISTANTCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), BANGALORE, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE ANDEQUITY.
ITA NO.102 OF 2JOO
BBRITWEH
1.THB COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCENTRAL CIRCLE, |C.R.BUILDINGQUEENS ROAD,BANGALORE
2 .THEK ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TACENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2)C.R.BUILDING,QUEENS ROADBANGALORE —. APPELLANTS |
(BY SRI.K V ARAVIND - ADV).
ANT)
SHRI NARASI KUMAR L PATELVIJAYALAKSHMI NILAYA
NO.14, 1ST CROSS, BTM LAYOUT|II STAGE, BANGALORE .. RESPONDENT|
(By M/S.A SHANKAR & M LAVA —- ADVS.)
THIS ITA IS FILED U/S.260-A OF I.T.ACT, 1961)ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 31-10-2008 PASSED INIT(SS)A NO.27/BNG/2008, FOR THE ASSESSMENT PERIOD01.04.1996 TO 03.04.2002, PRAYING THAT THIS HON BLECOURT MAY BB PLEASKD TO:
I. FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW|STATED THEREIN,Ill ALLOW THR APPKRKAL AND SET ASIDB THERE ORPASSEDBY|THEITA TBANGALOREIN-IT(SS)ANO.27/BNG/2008 DATED 31-10-2008 CONFIRMING THE|ORDER OF THR APPKRHLLATE COMMISSIONBR ANDCONFIRM THR ORDER PASSKHD BY THR ASSISTANTCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), BANGALORE, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE ANDEQUITY.
ITA NO.103 OF 2009
BETWEEN
1.THB COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCENTRAL CIRCLE, |C.R.BUILDINGQUEENS ROAD,BANGALORE
”.THR ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2)C.R.BUILDING,QUEENS ROAD.BANGALORE —. APPELLANTS |
(BY SRI.K V ARAVIND - ADV).
4
ANT)
SHRI RATILAL L PATEL |
PROP. SRI.LAKSHMI VIJAY SAW MILLSNO.4/10, OPP. BPL HOSUR ROADBOMMANAHALLI, BANGALORE ... RESPONDENT|
(By M/S. A SHANKAR & M LAVA —- ADVS.)
THIS ITA IS FILED U/S.2600-A OF I.T.ACT, 1961ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 31-10-2008 PASSED INIT(SS)A NO.25/BNG/2008, FOR THE ASSESSMENT PERIOD01.04.1996 TO 03.04.2002, PRAYING THAT THIS HON'BLECOURT MAY BB PLEASKD TO:
I. FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW|STATED THEREIN,
Ill ALLOW THR APPKRKAL AND SET ASIDB THERE ORPASSEDBY|THEITA TBANGALOREIN-IT(SS)ANO.25/BNG/2008, DATED 31-10-2008 CONFIRMING THE|ORDER OF THR APPKRHLLATE COMMISSIONBR ANDCONFIRM THRE ORDER PASSHKHD BY THE ASSISTACOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2),BANGALORE, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THRESH APPEALS COMING ON FOR HERARING THIDAY, N.KUMAR J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
The subject matter of these three appeals is lessthan Rs.4,00,000/- in each cases. In view of thecircular No.2/2005 dated 24.10.2005, the appeals arenot maintainable. In fact, for the same reason, the)appeals preferred by the Revenue challenging the
E5:A859�>;<!33C@AD4�:?4<�!:93�8<�63�C@49@443C�60�82@4�
�<5;8����<;�823�B3;0�4:93�;3:4<A4��82343�:>>3:?4�:;3�:?4<�C@49@443C���
����C"(����������������������������������C"(������������
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.