Ita/10/2009 Of Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Trivandrum v. Smt.b.shylaja,Aswathi Enterprise,Kollam
High Court
29 Jul 2021 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/10/2009 Of Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Trivandrum v. Smt.b.shylaja,Aswathi Enterprise,Kollam
Date of order
29 Jul 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/10/2009 Of Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Trivandrum v. Smt.b.shylaja,Aswathi Enterprise,Kollam, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Referring to the Supreme Court judgment and latest circular, we areof the view that the appeal is not maintenable, hence is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
THURSDAY, THE 29 DAY OF JULY 2021 / 7TH SRAVANA, 1943
ITA NO. 10 OF 2009
AGAINST THE ORDER IN ITA 778/2005 OF I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH,
ERNAKULAM
APPELLANT:
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,TRIVANDRUMTHIRUVANANTHAPURAM.BY ADVS.SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SR.COUNSEL, GOI(TAXES)SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
RESPONDENT:
SMT.B.SHYLAJA,ASWATHI ENTERPRISE,KOLLAMBEACH ROAD,KOLLAM.BY ADV SRI.S.ARUN RAJ
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON29.07.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
ITA No.10 of 2009
JUDGMENT
S.V.Bhatti, J.
The Revenue is the appellant in the instant appeal.
2. Heard learned Standing counsel Sri Jose Joseph for the appellant and Adv.S.Arunraj for respondent.
3. The value in the appeal is less than the limit prescribed by CBDT vCircular. The Supreme Court in the judgment reported in S.C.Naregal
Commissioner of Income Tax (2019) 418 ITR 455 (SC) has considered theeffect of CBDT Circular and dismissed the appeal coming within thepurport of CBDT Circular.
4. The valuation of the subject appeal, since is less than the limitstipulated by CBDT Circular, and also the judgment of Apex Court inS.C.Naregal (supra) is applicable to the appeal.
Referring to the Supreme Court judgment and latest circular, we areof the view that the appeal is not maintenable, hence is dismissed.
Sd/- S.V.BHATTI
Judge
css/
sd/- BECHU KURIAN THOMAS Judge
PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:
APPENDIX
ANN.ATRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE ASSESSING OFFICERDATED 22.3.2002.DATED 22.3.2002.
ANN.BTRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE COMMR. OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) DATED 8.2.2005.TAX (APPEALS) DATED 8.2.2005.
ANN.CTRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
DATED 28.9.2006.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.