Case LawHigh Court › Ita/103/2001 Of Sree Rajyel & Company v....

Ita/103/2001 Of Sree Rajyel & Company v. The Commissioner Of Incometax

High Court 25 Jun 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/103/2001 Of Sree Rajyel & Company v. The Commissioner Of Incometax
Date of order
25 Jun 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Ita/103/2001 Of Sree Rajyel & Company v. The Commissioner Of Incometax, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN WEDNESDAY, THE 25TH JUNE 2008 / 4TH ASHADHA 1930 ITA.No. 103 of 2001() --------------------- (AGAINST THE ORDER IN M.P.NO.119(COCH)/98 IN ITA.384(COCH)/1994 DATED 16/03/1999 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH) .................... APPELLANT ----------------- SREE RAJVEL & COMPANY,RESIDENCY ROAD, ASRAMOM, KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.V.G.ARUN RESPONDENTS: ------------- THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TRIVANDRUM. BY ADV. GEORGE K.GEORGE, SC FOR IT THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 25/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & V.K.MOHANAN, JJ.-------------------------I.T.A.No.103 of 2001 --------------------------------- Dated, this the 25[th] day of June, 2008 J U D G M E N T Ramachandran Nair, J. The ITA arises from the order in a miscellaneous application,whereunder the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal partially grantedrectification of the original appellate order. It is seen that withouttaking note of that order in the miscellaneous petition, this Courthas disposed of the I.T.R., arising from the order of the ITAT, videjudgment dated 21/08/2003 in I.T.R. No.28/2000. Since theTribunal's order has merged with the judgment of the High Court,the rectification or review if at all possible is only in the judgment ofthe High Court. Therefore, the I.T.A. is closed leaving freedom tothe petitioner to make appropriate application before this Court inthe disposed of ITR. (C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE) (V.K.MOHANAN, JUDGE)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan