In Ita/103/2017 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax Guwahati-I v. Surekha Projects Private Limited, the High Court (2017) decided the matter.
Decision: Sharma, the learned Standing Counsel for the Income Tax Department refers to the Circular No.21/2015, dated 10.12.2015 to submit that since the taxable amount in the present case is less than Rs.20 lakh, the appellant is under instruction to withdraw the Appeal.In view of the above submission made b...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
ITA 103/2017
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROYHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NELSON SAILO
(Hrishikesh Roy, J)
This Appeal is filed under Section 260(A) of the Income Tax, 1961 by the Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) to challenge the verdict of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. However Mr. S. Sharma, the learned Standing Counsel for the Income Tax Department refers to the Circular No.21/2015, dated 10.12.2015 to submit that since the taxable amount in the present case is less than Rs.20 lakh, the appellant is under instruction to withdraw the Appeal.In view of the above submission made by the appellant’s lawyer, the Appeal is disposed of as not pressed.
The concerned copy of the Circular No.21/2015, dated 10.12.2015 be kept in the case record.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue