Case LawHigh Court › Ita/1045/2011 Of Panasonic Industrial As...

Ita/1045/2011 Of Panasonic Industrial Asia Pte Limited v. Deputy Director Of Income Tax

High Court 06 Sep 2011 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Ita/1045/2011 Of Panasonic Industrial Asia Pte Limited v. Deputy Director Of Income Tax
Date of order
06 Sep 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Ita/1045/2011 Of Panasonic Industrial Asia Pte Limited v. Deputy Director Of Income Tax, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: These appeals are hereby dismissed as withdrawn in view of aforesaidobservations. e SEPTEMBER 06, 2OL1 rd J.R [MtDHA, ]J.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

r-b L&3 o/o O6.O9.?OLL Present: Mr. Salil Kapoor and Mr. Sanat Kapoor, Advocates for theAppellant/assessee.Mr. Ruches Sinha for Mr. N.P. Sahni, Advocate for therespondent/reven ue. + ITA Nos.LO43l2Ot l & LO45/2OLL *( ln these appeals, the appellant /assessee has challenged the reopeningof the assessment under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act. Otherwise, theappellant/ assessee accept that the Tribunal has given substantial relief tothe appellant on merits. In case the revenue comes in appeal, it will be open to the appellant/assessee to file cross objections challenging the validity of reassessmentproceedings. These appeals are hereby dismissed as withdrawn in view of aforesaidobservations. e SEPTEMBER 06, 2OL1 rd J.R [MtDHA, ]J. Digitally Signed By:AMULYACertify that the digital file andphysical file have been compared andthe digital data is as per the physicalfile and no page is missing.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan