Case LawHigh Court › Ita/1054/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Ita/1054/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Samsung Electronics Co Ltd

High Court 28 Aug 2012 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/1054/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Samsung Electronics Co Ltd
Date of order
28 Aug 2012
Assessment year(s)
2005-06
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Ita/1054/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Samsung Electronics Co Ltd, the High Court (2012) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE DATED THIS THER 2 DAY OF AUGUST, 2012 PRESENT THER HON BLE MR. JUSTICE K.SREEBEDHAR ANT THR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICK B.MANOHAR 1.T.A. No. 1054 OF 2008 BBRITIWE 1.The Commissioner of Income Tax,C.R. Building,Queens Road,Bangalore.C.R. Building,Queens Road,Bangalore. ooThe Commissioner of Income Tax,Appeals-IV,C.R. Building,Queens Road,Bangalore. (By Sri K.V. Aravind, Advocate) Appellants AND: samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.,India Software Operations,No.67, Infantry Road,Bangalore-560001. Respondent (By Sri Ramesh T. tor M/s.Universal Legal, Advocate) This I.T.A. is filed U/s.2600-A of the I.T. Act, 196arising out of Order dated 09.05.2008 passed in ITA No.875/BANG/2007, for the Assessment Year 2005-06,praying that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to:(i) formulate the substantial questions of law stated thereinand (11) allow the appeal and set aside the order passed bythe ITAT Bangalore in ITA No.8/75/BANG/2007, date09.05.2008confirmingthe|orders otthe|AppellateCommissioner, in the interest of justice and equity. This appeal is coming on for final hearing this day,SREEDHAR RAO, J..,delivered the following: JU DGMENT This Court in ITA No.1050/2008 pertaining to thesame assessee, it is held that the appeal is maintainableU/s.248(a) of the I.T. Act directly to the Commissioner ofIncome Tax appeals without assessment by the AssessingOfficer in respect of TDS. The question involved in thepresent case is similar. Accordingly the appeals are disposedof in the terms in ITA No.1050/2008. sd/-JUDGE 2&0D od/-JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan