Case LawHigh Court › Ita/1064/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Ita/1064/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Cochin v. Chakolas Spinning And Weaving Mills Ltd

High Court 16 Nov 2009 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/1064/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Cochin v. Chakolas Spinning And Weaving Mills Ltd
Date of order
16 Nov 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Ita/1064/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Cochin v. Chakolas Spinning And Weaving Mills Ltd, the High Court (2009) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Issue: The question raised is whether the Tribunal wasjustified in holding that the income escapedassessment is time barred.

Decision: Consequently,the appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN MONDAY, THE 16TH NOVEMBER 2009 / 25TH KARTHIKA 1931 ITA.No. 1064 of 2009() ---------------------- ITA.1282/COCH/2004 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH .................... APPELLANT/APPELLANT ----------------------------------- THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, COCHIN BY ADV. SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SR.COUNSEL, GOI(TAXES) SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX RESPONDENT(S): --------------- CHAKOLAS SPINNING AND WEAVING MILLS LTD KALAMASSERRY. BY ADV. SRI.JOSEPH KODIANTHARA & SRI.TERRY V.JAMES THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 16/11/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR &V.K.MOHANAN, JJ. ---------------------------------------- I.T.A. No.1064 OF 2009 ---------------------------------------- Dated, the 16[th] November, 2009 JUDGMENT Ramachandran Nair, J. The question raised is whether the Tribunal wasjustified in holding that the income escapedassessment is time barred. We notice that the purposeof reopening was to bring to tax irregular claim ofexemption allowed under section 54D of the I.T.Act inthe computation of capital gains. It is seen from theTribunal's order that original proposal was made torectify the assessment under section 154 of the Act.Even though the assessee objected, the AssessingOfficer waited for another three years to issue noticeunder section 148. Obviously, the officer allowed thematter to get time barred to pass order under section147. We do not know under what circumstance this ITA 1064/09. happened. In any case it is seen from the Tribunal's orderthat the assessee has declared the details required in thecomputation of capital gains and, therefore, no reopeningof the issue can be made under section 147 for therelevant assessment years after four years. Consequently,the appeal is dismissed. C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR JUDGE V.K.MOHANAN, JUDGE kvm/- ITA 1064/09. -:3:- V.K.MOHANAN, J. O.P.No. JUDGMENT Dated:..
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan