Case LawHigh Court › Ita/1065/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Ita/1065/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Motor Industries Co Ltd

High Court 31 Oct 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/1065/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Motor Industries Co Ltd
Date of order
31 Oct 2014
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/1065/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Motor Industries Co Ltd, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THB HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALOREDATED THIS THR 3lst DAY OF OCTOBBR 2014. PRESENT THR HON BLE MR. JUSTICE N. KUMAR. AND THR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICK B. MANOHAR| ITA No.1065 OF 2OO8 BETWEEN; 1.The Commissioner of Income-Tax,C.R. Building, Queens Road,Bangalore. 2.The Asst. Commissioner of Income-Tax,Circle-12(1), C.R. Building,Queens Road, Bangalore. _APPBLLANTS(By Sri.K.V. Aravind, Advocate) AND:M/s.Motor Industries Co. Ltd.,(Bosch Limited), Hosur Road,Adugodi, Bangalore-30... RESPONDENT (By Sriyuths. 8.E. Dastur and Percy Pardiwala, SeniorAdvocates for M/s.King and Partridge) -Q-O-O-O-O- This appeal is filed under Section 260-A of I.T. Act, 1961 arising out of Order dated 12.6.2008 passed inITA.No.336/BNG/2005,andCorrigendumdated 18.8.2008,|for.theassessment year2001-02TO formulate the substantial questions of law _ statetherein and to allow the appeal and set aside the orderpassedby the ITAT,Bangalore|1nITA.No.336/BNG/2005,dated12.06.2008andCorrigendum dagted 18.08.2008 and confirm the orderof the Appellate Commissioner and confirm the orderpassed by the Assistant Commissioner of India Tax,Circle-12(1), Bangalore. N. KUMAR, J.delivered the following:- This appeal coming on for admission this day, JUDGMENT In view of the orders passed in ITA.No.1064/08 inthe case of assessee itself, this appeal is also dismissedanswering all the questions in favour of the assesseeand against the revenue. Sd/-. JUDGE. Sd/-. JUDGE.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan