Ita/1067/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. K.k.bahuleyan
High Court
29 Sep 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/1067/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. K.k.bahuleyan
Date of order
29 Sep 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ita/1067/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. K.k.bahuleyan, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: We do not findany substantial question of law arising from the order of the Tribunal.Consequently, the appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN
TUESDAY, THE 29TH SEPTEMBER 2009 / 7TH ASWINA 1931
ITA.No. 1067 of 2009()
----------------------
AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 16/01/2008 IN IT(S&S)A 83/COCH/2004
of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH
....................
APPELLANT/APPELLANT:
----------------------------------------
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,
THRISSUR.
BY ADV. SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SR.COUNSEL, GOI(TAXES)
SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
RESPONDENT(S):
---------------
SHRI.K.K.BAHULEYAN,
KARAYIL HOUSE, MANALUR POST,
THRISSUR DISTRICT.
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 29/09/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
--------------------------------------------
I.T.A. No. 1067 OF 2009
--------------------------------------------
Dated this the 29th day of September, 2009
JUDGMENT
Ramachandran Nair, J.
Heard standing counsel appearing for the appellant. Thequestions raised pertain to various additions made in block assessmentdeleted by the Tribunal. We notice that even though credit entries weredenied by the creditors the assessee alternatively pleaded availability ofsource of fund which was proved before the Tribunal. The Tribunalaccepted the evidence produced and deleted additions. We do not findany substantial question of law arising from the order of the Tribunal.Consequently, the appeal is dismissed.
(C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR)
Judge.
(V.K. MOHANAN)
Judge.
kk
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.